Labor Relations
Labor relations in the Philippines are principally regulated by the Labor Code of the Philippines, which outlines the rights and responsibilities of both employers and employees. This legislation seeks to advance social justice and safeguard workers’ rights while encouraging harmonious relationships within the industrial sector.
The landscape of labor relations in the Philippines is defined by a legal structure that defends workers’ rights and fosters constructive engagement between employers and employees. Significant rulings from the Supreme Court have affirmed core principles such as organization, negotiation, labor standards, and dispute resolution, ensuring that labor laws maintain the dignity and rights of workers.
1. Right to Organize
This right allows workers to form, join, or assist labor organizations for the purpose of collective bargaining or for mutual aid and protection. The Labor Code provides protections against discrimination for union activities.
Article 243 of the Labor Code states that “the right of workers to organize themselves is guaranteed,” and it prohibits interference by employers in the establishment of unions.
Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. PALEA (G.R. No. 157100, June 24, 2010).
Facts: The case involved Philippine Airlines’ refusal to recognize the union’s right to bargain collectively, leading to a dispute regarding the legitimacy of the union.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court ruled that workers have the constitutional right to organize and that the company’s actions constituted an infringement of this right, emphasizing the importance of respecting labor organization.
2. Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining refers to the negotiation process between employers and employees aimed at reaching agreements regarding working conditions, wages, and other employment terms.
​
Article 250 mandates that collective bargaining negotiations must be conducted in good faith.
Article 263 outlines the rights of labor unions to negotiate collective bargaining agreements.
Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) v. Secretary of Labor (G.R. No. 202429, April 5, 2016).
Facts: This case involved a dispute over the implementation of a collective bargaining agreement and the validity of the union’s negotiations with the employer.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court upheld the principle of collective bargaining and emphasized the necessity for employers to engage in good faith negotiations, affirming the rights of unions to negotiate fair terms.
3. Dispute Resolution
This area covers mechanisms for resolving conflicts between employers and employees, including grievances, arbitrations, and labor disputes. The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) facilitates this process.
​Article 262 provides for the settlement of disputes arising from employer-employee relations.
Article 274 empowers the Secretary of Labor to refer disputes for compulsory arbitration.
San Miguel Corporation v. Atty. Arnel Dela Cruz (G.R. No. 225301, September 12, 2018).
Facts: The case revolved around the dismissal of an employee, which led to a dispute over the appropriate resolution mechanisms under the Labor Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of fair and just dispute resolution processes, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach in addressing employee grievances and the importance of due process in termination cases.
4. Strikes and Lockouts
The right to strike is enshrined in Article III, Section 8 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and further elaborated in the Labor Code of the Philippines. Legal strikes must adhere to specific regulations, including notification procedures, and can only be called under lawful circumstances such as the absence of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) or failure to comply with labor standards.
Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. CA (G.R. No. 237623, December 3, 2019)
Facts: This case involved a labor dispute between Philippine Airlines and its employees represented by the Philippine Airlines Employees’ Association (PALEA). The employees called for a strike to protest the airline’s decision to outsource several functions, which they claimed violated their existing CBA.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court ruled that the strike was legal, affirming the workers’ right to protest against actions that violated their CBA. The decision emphasized the need for employers to uphold labor agreements and acknowledged the right to strike as a fundamental labor right.
5. Labor Arbitration
Labor arbitration in the Philippines is primarily governed by the Labor Code and implemented by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). The NLRC serves as the quasi-judicial body that adjudicates labor disputes, while DOLE provides mediation services to facilitate settlements.
Philippine International Air Terminals Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission (G.R. No. 219660, July 15, 2020)
Facts: In this case, employees of the Philippine International Air Terminals Co. raised grievances regarding unfair labor practices, leading to arbitration proceedings. The NLRC ruled in favor of the employees, mandating reinstatement and back wages.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court upheld the NLRC’s decision, reinforcing the importance of arbitration in resolving labor disputes. The ruling highlighted the role of the NLRC in ensuring fair labor practices and the necessity of adhering to procedural due process during arbitration.
Reyes v. National Labor Relations Commission (G.R. No. 229800, September 9, 2021)
Facts: This case involved a dispute over the dismissal of employees, where the NLRC found that due process was not followed in terminating the employees.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court reiterated that labor arbitration must comply with established legal standards, emphasizing the significance of due process in labor disputes. The decision reinforced the NLRC’s responsibility to ensure that labor rights are upheld in the arbitration process.