top of page

Safety and Health Standards

Republic Act No. 11058, signed into law on August 17, 2018, strengthens the existing occupational safety and health (OSH) standards in the Philippines by emphasizing the responsibility of employers to provide a safe and healthy work environment for their employees. This law expands the coverage of OSH regulations, ensuring a more robust framework for the prevention of workplace accidents and diseases.

 

Key Provisions of RA 11058:

Duty of Employers (Section 3):
Employers are mandated to provide a workplace that is free from danger and that complies with the standards for safety and health. This includes identifying potential risks, providing necessary safeguards, and ensuring that all employees are trained in health and safety protocols. Employers are responsible for providing personal protective equipment (PPE), ensuring proper sanitation, and conducting regular safety drills and training programs.

 

Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC (G.R. No. 106942, November 9, 1994)
Facts: This case involved an employee who suffered injuries due to unsafe working conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that employers must ensure the workplace is safe and that they have complied with the OSH standards to prevent accidents. Failure to comply makes the employer liable for the employee’s injuries.

 

Designation of Safety Officer (Section 5):
The law mandates the appointment of a Safety Officer or an OSH officer to oversee the implementation of safety programs. This officer is responsible for ensuring that the workplace is free from hazards and for addressing any immediate safety concerns.

 

Health Standards and Hazardous Workplaces (Section 4):
Employers must address health hazards within the workplace, which include chemical, biological, physical, ergonomic, and psychosocial hazards. The law specifically requires employers to provide appropriate ventilation, sanitation, and other health-related measures. Employers are required to conduct health assessments, including pre-employment, periodic, and exit  medical exams to assess the health condition of employees in relation to their work.

SSS v. NLRC (G.R. No. 123812, October 13, 1998)

Facts: This case involved an employee who was exposed to a hazardous work environment. The employee filed for compensation due to work-related illnesses.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court ruled that employers must comply with the provisions of occupational health standards and ensure that employees are not subjected to unnecessary risks in the workplace. Employers must establish protocols for workplace health to prevent work-related illnesses.

 

Accident Prevention and Reporting (Section 6):
RA 11058 mandates that employers establish an effective system for reporting accidents and unsafe work conditions. Any work-related injury or illness must be reported within 24 hours to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), and appropriate corrective actions must be taken to avoid recurrence.

 

Training and Education on OSH (Section 9):
The law requires that employers regularly conduct safety training for workers, especially those in high-risk jobs. This includes training on proper handling of hazardous materials, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), emergency response, and first aid.

 

Penalties for Non-Compliance (Section 10):
Employers who fail to comply with the requirements of the law may face substantial penalties, including fines or imprisonment. The law sets specific penalties for those who violate provisions related to workplace safety, health assessments, and the reporting of accidents. Employers who fail to comply with safety standards may face fines of P10,000 to P100,000 per violation, and if the violation results in injury or death, the penalties may be higher.

Tan v. Manila Electric Company (G.R. No. 172024, August 28, 2007)
Facts: An employee of Manila Electric Company (Meralco) filed a case for injuries sustained due to lack of adequate safety measures during work.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court ruled that Meralco was liable for the injuries, highlighting the company's failure to observe proper safety protocols and lack of proper training for workers, thus violating the OSH standards.

bottom of page